Every strategy and guide published by North Shore is backed by the board-certified expertise of our Co-Founders. With decades of combined experience in holistic admissions, Amy and Debbie ensure our guidance is objective, unbiased, and focused exclusively on your student's best fit.
A student can spend four years on an activity and still give colleges almost no useful information about it.
The problem often starts before the 150-character description. Students choose the wrong details, repeat information already reported elsewhere, leave out their actual responsibilities, or arrange their activities according to what they assume colleges want to see.
The Common App allows up to ten activities, but students don't have to use every slot. Each entry has a 150-character description, a separate organization field, and space to report time commitments.
At North Shore College Consulting, we recommend reviewing seven decisions before submitting that list. They affect how clearly an application communicates what a student did, what responsibilities they carried, and how they spent their time outside the classroom.
For the 2026-27 cycle, Common App renamed its activities area Activities and Experiences and made the position/leadership field optional.
The character limits remain unchanged.
Source: Common App, 2026-27 First-Year Application Updates, May 21, 2026; Approaching the Activities Section, September 2026.
That distinction between fields matters. A student who repeats an organization name, position title, and participation hours inside the description uses valuable space to report information already available elsewhere.
Here are seven mistakes we recommend checking before submission.
A surprising amount of space in activity descriptions goes toward explaining what a club, nonprofit, or team does.
But the name of an organization and the student's involvement in it are different pieces of information.
Compare these two questions:
Only the second belongs at the center of the activity description.
Consider a student whose description says they participated in meetings, supported initiatives, and helped organize events. That may be accurate, but it leaves out the information that could distinguish their contribution.
Which events? What work were they personally responsible for? Did they coordinate volunteers, manage registrations, prepare materials, teach younger members, or handle logistics?
Those answers are more useful than another sentence about the organization's mission. We cover how readers interpret what an activity actually says about a student in How Do Colleges Evaluate Extracurricular Activities?
The parent test: Cover the organization name and position title. Read only the 150-character description. Can you identify what your student personally did?
If the description could have been written by almost any member, ask your student for more detail.
Students commonly repeat their titles, organization names, and time commitments inside their descriptions.
For the 2026-27 Common App, those details can be reported separately.
Our editing approach is to assign each piece of information a job.
Position field: The student's actual title or role, if they have one.
Organization field: The name of the club, business, team, or organization, written clearly enough for someone outside the school to understand.
Description field: The student's specific work, responsibility, contribution, or accomplishment.
For a student with a leadership title, the description should explain what that leadership involved. Being president is a title. Planning meetings, assigning work, developing programming, or managing a project describes what the student did.
There's another important change for 2026-27: a student no longer needs a formal leadership title to complete an activity entry.
That is useful for students reporting caregiving, independent projects, hobbies, or other commitments that don't come with an official position.
Do not manufacture a title to make the experience seem more impressive. Explain the responsibility.
Look for phrases that consume space without adding information:
Fragments and semicolons can help save space, provided the description remains understandable. Avoid unexplained acronyms and abbreviations that make sense only within the student's school.
The test: Every phrase should add information that the other fields don't already provide.
Specific numbers can make a description more informative.
The number of students tutored, the number of performances completed, the size of a program managed, or the amount of money actually raised may help explain the scale of a student's work. For how selective colleges weigh scale against distinction, see How Selective Colleges Evaluate Activities, Impact, and Distinction.
But not every worthwhile activity produces a measurable outcome.
A student who works at a local business might have substantial responsibilities without increasing revenue or managing employees. A student helping care for a younger sibling may have a major time commitment without a project, award, or accomplishment to report.
Those experiences should not be rewritten to manufacture impact.
At North Shore, we recommend building each description from three types of information:
1. Action: What did the student do?
2. Responsibility or scope: What did the student manage, create, maintain, teach, or contribute?
3. Result, when applicable: What changed, was completed, or can be verified?
Not every entry needs all three. Choose the details that make the particular experience understandable.
Generic description pattern:
"Member of [organization]. Participated in meetings and helped with events."
Stronger description framework:
"[Specific responsibility or action]; [project, work product, or contribution]; [verified scope or result, if relevant]."
The second framework forces the student to identify the actual work rather than rely on a club name or position.
What a Stronger Activity Description Looks Like
BEFORE: Generic description (121 characters)
Led Model UN meetings and helped members prepare for conferences, research countries, and develop public-speaking skills.
AFTER: Specific, evidence-based description (116 characters)
Developed 50+ Model UN lessons; taught twice-weekly classes; guided delegates' research and 10-page position papers.
Why the revision works
The first version tells us what a Model UN leader generally does. The second shows what this student actually contributed.
We learn that the student developed a substantial curriculum, taught recurring classes, and helped other delegates complete demanding research assignments.
Notice what the revision doesn't do. It doesn't invent an outcome, claim the club grew, or exaggerate the student's leadership. It uses specific, documented responsibilities to demonstrate the depth of the student's involvement.
The takeaway: A strong activity description doesn't need an impressive adjective or a manufactured impact statistic. It needs details that distinguish what this student did from what any other member might have done.
The strongest example would show a meaningful improvement without inventing an award, adding an unearned leadership claim, or exaggerating the scale of an activity.
One other caution: students sometimes describe what an organization accomplished as though they personally accomplished it.
If a group raised money, organized an event, or launched an initiative, the student's description should make their own contribution clear. Team accomplishments can be included, but they should not be presented as individual achievements when they were collaborative.
One of the most common strategic questions we hear is whether a student should put the activity related to their intended major first.
Our answer is that major relevance is one consideration, not an automatic ranking rule.
A student interested in business might also be a committed musician, varsity athlete, employee, or community volunteer. It would be a mistake to bury a substantial commitment simply because another activity sounds more directly connected to a proposed academic major.
When deciding on the order, we ask students to consider:
The answers may point toward an academic activity, but they may just as easily point toward a job, athletic commitment, creative pursuit, or family responsibility.
Yale admissions officers addressed this issue in their July 2021 Inside the Yale Admissions Office podcast. They encouraged students to consider which activities were genuinely most important rather than trying to outguess admissions officers about the order. A full transcript is on Yale's site.
That is guidance from one institution, not a universal ranking formula. It does support an important principle: do not rearrange a student's life to make the activity list look like a predetermined academic narrative.
Before numbering the activities, have your student rank them privately in order of personal significance.
Then review that order alongside the actual time commitments, responsibilities, and contributions.
Ask whether the first few entries provide a reasonable introduction to how the student spends their time.
An activity does not need to relate to an intended major to deserve a prominent position.
The Common App asks students to report hours per week and weeks per year for each activity.
These fields deserve more attention than a quick estimate made the night before submission.
Common App's September 2026 guidance explicitly permits students to use their best estimate when exact historical figures are unavailable.
The key is to make that estimate honestly.
Start by identifying when each activity actually occurred.
A fall sport, summer job, school-year club, and year-round volunteer commitment have different schedules. Reporting each one as though it operated throughout the year can misrepresent the student's involvement.
We recommend creating a simple calendar that includes:
Look especially closely at overlapping commitments. Readers see the hours column alongside the transcript; How Admissions Officers Read a Transcript explains what else is in the file at the same moment.
If a student reports several demanding activities during the same school semester, the schedule should be plausible when considered alongside classes and other obligations.
But don't make the opposite mistake of automatically reducing legitimate hours because the total seems high. Some students genuinely have substantial work, athletic, family, and extracurricular commitments.
The test: Could your student explain how they arrived at the reported hours using their actual schedule?
If they cannot, reconstruct the estimate from calendars, work schedules, practice schedules, or other records rather than selecting a number because it sounds impressive.
The Common App provides a separate section for academic honors.
For the 2026-27 application, students may report up to five academic honors received during high school, including when each was received and the level of recognition.
But that does not mean every award belongs there.
The activities description field explicitly permits students to include honors won and accomplishments.
We recommend treating the two sections as complementary.
Use the Honors section for academic distinctions that fit the section's stated purpose.
Use an activity description when an achievement or recognition helps explain a student's accomplishment within that particular activity.
For example, an award directly connected to a competitive activity may provide important context about the student's level of participation. It can be useful to include that information where the activity is described.
The decision depends on the significance of the award, the other honors available to report, and which placement makes the overall application clearer.
Is it actually an honor?
Participation in a program, attendance at a conference, or membership in an organization should not automatically be presented as an award.
Where is the recognition most meaningful?
A distinction tied to an academic accomplishment may fit naturally in Honors. Recognition earned through an extracurricular activity may be clearer within that activity.
Is the same information being repeated?
Duplication is not automatically prohibited, but it should serve a purpose. If the two entries communicate exactly the same information, consider using that space for something different.
Don't fill an award field with a questionable distinction merely because it is available.
Students sometimes focus so heavily on clubs, leadership positions, and formal extracurriculars that they overlook other substantial responsibilities.
The Common App explicitly recognizes work, family responsibilities, hobbies, volunteer service, and sports as experiences students may report.
A paid job belongs in consideration. So does consistent caregiving, a meaningful independent pursuit, or a responsibility outside school that takes considerable time. The same logic applies to how summer work is read.
Those experiences don't need to be disguised as traditional extracurricular leadership.
This is particularly important for students who have limited time for school clubs because they work, contribute to their household, or have significant responsibilities at home.
Yale admissions officers have also publicly discussed the value of understanding employment and family responsibilities when reviewing applicants. That is a useful example of how a college may consider a student's opportunities and circumstances, although individual institutions have their own review practices.
No.
Common App explicitly states that applicants may list up to ten activities but do not have to use all ten spaces.
We would rather see a list that accurately represents six or seven meaningful commitments than one padded with entries the student barely participated in.
At the same time, don't assume that an ordinary commitment is unworthy of inclusion. An activity does not need a leadership title, award, or extraordinary accomplishment to provide useful information.
The test: Would removing this entry cause a meaningful part of how your student spent their high school years to disappear from the application?
If yes, reconsider leaving it out.
Writing a strong activities section is easier when a student has reliable information to work from.
Unfortunately, some of the details most useful in an activity description are also easy to forget.
A student may remember serving on a committee without remembering which project they handled. They may remember volunteering for several years but not the specific duties they performed each semester.
That is why we recommend keeping an activity inventory throughout high school.
A freshman doesn't need polished activity descriptions. They need a record of what happened.
A sophomore can update the inventory each semester.
A junior should review the entries for missing details while there is still time to recover them.
And a senior can use the inventory as the source material for the Common App.
Freshman and sophomore planning sits inside a longer sequence; see Freshman Year Will Be a Third of Your Child's Transcript and Sophomore Year College Planning: The Sequence Decides Senior Year.
This also creates an opportunity for a different conversation. If your teenager has been involved in an activity for several years, what are they actually doing now? Have their responsibilities changed? Are they still interested?
Those are better questions than whether the activity will look impressive on an application.
Not automatically. We recommend ordering activities according to genuine importance, sustained commitment, responsibility, and contribution. A major-related experience may rank highly, but academic relevance alone should not determine the order.
Yes. Common App explicitly identifies employment and family responsibilities as experiences students may report. Describe the actual work or responsibility without inventing a leadership title or measurable impact.
Yes. Common App's activity description field expressly allows honors won and accomplishments. Consider whether that recognition is best communicated in the activity description or the separate academic Honors section.
No. We recommend including accurate numbers when they provide useful evidence of responsibility, scale, or accomplishment. When no meaningful metric exists, a precise explanation of the student's work is more appropriate than an invented result.
That is permitted. Common App's guidance says students do not need to fill all ten slots. Focus on providing a useful account of the student's actual commitments rather than reaching a predetermined number.
Common App's September 2026 guidance identifies the Additional Information question in the Writing section as a place to elaborate on an activity or experience.
Our recommendation is to use it selectively. It can help clarify something that genuinely needs more explanation, but it should not become an automatic extension of every activity description.
Common App's submission affirmation states that a submitted application cannot be altered. Students who want to provide additional information to a college after submission must contact that institution directly.
Before each submission, review the version of the application being sent to that college.
This week: Review every activity description. Identify vague phrases, repeated titles, missing responsibilities, unclear abbreviations, and unverified numbers.
Before the next application deadline: Reconsider the ordering, reconcile the reported hours, review the placement of awards, and check the application's final preview.
Before submitting to each college: Confirm that the version being sent accurately reflects the student's activities and experiences.
This month: Create an activity inventory and reconstruct the current list using calendars, emails, team information, and club records.
During the rest of junior year: Record new responsibilities, projects, and accomplishments while the details are available.
Before senior year: Review which commitments are most significant and which details are missing from the inventory.
This week: Start the inventory with the activities and responsibilities your student already has.
Each semester: Update participation dates, hours, duties, and projects.
Each year: Discuss whether those commitments remain meaningful and whether your student wants to deepen, change, or discontinue them.
The full grade-by-grade sequence is in College Admissions Strategy by Grade Level.
The purpose is not to engineer a college application years in advance. It is to preserve an accurate record of what your student actually does.
At North Shore College Consulting, these are the questions we recommend asking when reviewing an activities list:
An effective activities list should help someone unfamiliar with your student understand how they spent their time, what responsibilities they took on, and what they contributed.
That takes more than trimming sentences to fit 150 characters. It takes choosing the right information before the editing begins.
For families who want help evaluating which activities to include, how to present them, or how they fit into the larger application, North Shore College Consulting provides individualized college admissions guidance.
You don't have to navigate the complexities of college admissions alone. Whether you are aiming for the Ivy League, a top-tier public university, or a highly selective major, our expert counselors are here to help you craft a personal brand that stands out.
